Weekly News Roundup: Army MRE Overhaul, AMPV 30mm Confusion, War Acquisition Reform, and Navy Amphib Command Changes

The past week brought a mixed bag of military developments — from the Army's push to reimagine field rations with alternative proteins, to a publicized but premature announcement about 30mm-armed armored vehicles, to acquisition reforms aimed at getting new gear to troops faster, to a significant leadership change in how the Navy commands its amphibious fleet. Here's what's worth knowing.

Army Wants to Grow Food in Combat Zones

The U.S. Army is looking for "alternative proteins" to put in MREs — not because it's going vegan, but because it wants to reduce reliance on fragile logistics networks in future conflicts. A Sources Sought Announcement from the Army Combat Capabilities Development Command – Soldier Center, posted to SAM.gov on April 29, calls for researchers and food industry partners to develop meat alternatives using fermentation or other novel biomanufacturing methods. The goal: enable soldiers to manufacture their own food in combat-forward environments where supply lines may be disrupted.

The announcement notes that any alternative protein would need to meet "stringent requirements for nutrition, shelf stability, and palatability." Soldiers have to actually eat the stuff for it to work. The Army specifically noted it is not looking for cell-cultured or lab-grown meat, or insect protein — it wants something new. The response deadline is May 15, reflecting a desire for quick turnaround. The broader context is drone warfare making supply routes more dangerous, pushing the military to explore ways to reduce forward logistical footprints. Last year, the Army rolled out its first plant-based MREs as part of a larger rations refresh drawn from soldier feedback.

The implications for tactical gear audiences are indirect but real: anything that changes how soldiers eat in the field affects what they carry, how they're equipped, and what gets stocked in forward operating bases. If biomanufactured rations catch on, it could reshape long-term supply chain strategies for deployed forces.

No, the Army Isn't Fielding 30mm AMPVs — Yet

The U.S. Army's 1st Cavalry Division posted on social media this week that it had received the "Army’s FIRST AMPV 30mm prototypes," complete with photos of vehicles armed with a turreted 30mm cannon. Multiple outlets ran with it as news. The reality, as The War Zone reported after checking with the Army and BAE Systems: the two AMPV 30s are company-funded prototypes, not procured systems. The Army has no plans to acquire this variant — at least for now.

The vehicles are being delivered for evaluation as part of the Transformation In Contact (TIC) 2.0 initiative, a program focused on rapidly fielding new capabilities to deployed units. BAE Systems confirmed the turret is the Kongsberg Medium Caliber Turret-30 (MCT-30) armed with a Mk 44 Bushmaster II automatic cannon, capable of using programmable airburst ammunition. The stated mission: counter small drones and unarmored ground threats.

The 1st Cavalry Division's social media post used language that implied fielding rather than evaluation — a distinction that matters when the Army's official channels suggest new weapons systems are entering service. The incident underscores how quickly defense news spreads based on a single post, and how often the initial framing doesn't survive scrutiny. For those tracking Army vehicle programs, the more relevant story remains the ongoing Bradley replacement effort, the tentatively designated XM30, which is slated to carry a 50mm cannon.

Department of War Overhauls Acquisition Process

The Department of War — yes, it still uses that name for certain internal functions — has directed a fundamental transformation of its acquisition process to get critical capabilities to troops faster. A May 2 announcement from Aberdeen Proving Ground laid out a menu of risk-reduction tools designed to accelerate development timelines while controlling costs. The mandate is frank about the problem: system reliability and long-term sustainment account for up to 70 percent of a weapon system's total cost.

The new approach includes early engineering component analysis using advanced simulators, modeling and simulation to replace expensive physical testing, reliability scorecards for weapon systems, and function-based assessments that tie test results directly to the operational tasks soldiers perform. A Bayesian statistical approach, the announcement claims, can reduce the need for physical testing by 60 percent or more. The Department also flagged Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) from MIT as a key tool for managing risks in increasingly software-intensive and autonomous platforms.

For defense contractors and the tactical gear industry, this signals a faster-moving acquisition environment. Programs that once took a decade from prototype to fielding may see compressed timelines if these methods prove effective. The Transformation Decision Analysis Center (TDAC) is driving the effort alongside Army Test and Evaluation Command and various DEVCOM centers.

Navy Ends Aviator Command of Amphibious Warships

In a notable break with tradition, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Daryl Caudle has directed that amphibious assault ships, transport docks, and dock landing ships be commanded by surface warfare officers — not aviators. The change, detailed in an April 24 memo confirmed authentic by the Navy, is tied to ongoing efforts to improve amphibious fleet readiness. Only about 45 percent of amphibious ships are currently "combat surge ready" compared with 63 percent of surface ships and 65 percent of submarines.

Caudle's memo frames the change around maintenance expertise and command stability. "Inherent in these improvements is the need for commanding officers to not only have exquisite knowledge of readiness, maintenance procedures, component design, and failure modes, damage control, and operational procedures, but also to be masters of their ships while remaining in command long enough to make real and effective changes," he wrote. Surface warfare officers spend more of their careers assigned to surface vessels and have deeper familiarity with amphibious operations and maintenance cycles.

A RAND Corporation analyst noted that while aviators who commanded amphibs generally performed adequately, they lacked the deep ship-specific background that surface warfare officers developed over their careers. The Navy will also study whether aviators will continue to need a "deep draft command tour" — commanding large vessels — to be eligible to command aircraft carriers. This is a structural shift in how the Navy develops its senior officers, and one that will ripple through assignments and career paths for years.

Quick Hits

• Air Force Special Warfare tested a commercial off-the-shelf kinetic interceptor with an expeditionary counter-small UAS system at Davis-Monthan AFB in April. The April 7 proof-of-concept involved Airmen from the 48th Rescue Squadron and 316th Civil Engineer Squadron EOD.
• Gatorz Eyewear released a Navy SEAL Foundation edition of its SENTIX frame, built from aircraft-grade aluminum with TruRay Smoke Polarized lenses. Proceeds support the Navy SEAL Foundation — a reminder that tactical gear and mission support often go hand in hand.
• SIG SAUER introduced new features in its SIG CONNECT app, adding the ability to create range challenges directly within the platform. The app turns live fire sessions into interactive training experiences with gamified feedback.

Source: Task & Purpose, The War Zone, Soldier Systems Daily

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Gear & Guides

• The Drone Netting Problem: Why Militaries Are Struggling to Stop FPV Attacks
• Shop Tactical Accessories
• Shop First Aid & Survival Gear

Sources: Task & Purpose, The War Zone, Soldier Systems Daily